Redness
Elevation of the red channel (a*) vs your own facial baseline — the research standard for measuring erythema.
- Change threshold
- 17.3
- Reliability
- 0.926 very high
- Measurement noise
- 6.2
MIRRA · The Ten Metrics
Every metric carries three numbers we publish: what it measures, the threshold below which we will not call a change an improvement, and how reliably it repeats on a retest. The third matters most — and we did not hide the weakest one.
Elevation of the red channel (a*) vs your own facial baseline — the research standard for measuring erythema.
Detection of localized dark areas — hyperpigmentation, sun damage and hormonal spots.
Where the tissue sits — the jawline and the nasolabial folds, from landmark geometry. Shown, not scored: it moves with expression.
Line density around the eyes and forehead — the strongest predictor of perceived age.
Specular reflections in the T-zone — actual oiliness, not how it feels.
Pore visibility on cheeks and nose — one of the 10 signs validated against dermatologists.
Local color homogeneity — research found it alone accounts for up to 20 years of perceived age.
Localized inflammatory lesions — counted separately from spots, because they answer a product in days rather than months.
A color reading in the tear-trough band alone — kept apart from crow’s feet, which are a texture reading over a wider area.
Light scattering from fine surface flaking — what reads as “flaky” before it is felt.
Thresholds: the wider of a capture-jitter study on 50 real scans and real repeat pairs · ICC from the jitter study, not from repeat visits · the metric comes from a model trained on licensed dermatology datasets · A SCAN, not a photograph: 5–9 frames fused